Conciseness Evaluator
Overview
Section titled “Overview”The ConcisenessEvaluator evaluates how concise an agent’s response is. It assesses whether the response communicates information efficiently without unnecessary verbosity, using a three-level scoring rubric.
Key Features
Section titled “Key Features”- Trace-Level Evaluation: Evaluates the most recent turn in the conversation
- Three-Level Scoring: Simple scale — Not Concise, Partially Concise, Perfectly Concise
- Async Support: Supports both synchronous and asynchronous evaluation
- Structured Reasoning: Provides step-by-step reasoning for each evaluation
When to Use
Section titled “When to Use”Use the ConcisenessEvaluator when you need to:
- Ensure agents don’t produce unnecessarily verbose responses
- Optimize response length for user experience
- Detect padding or filler content in agent outputs
- Compare verbosity across different agent configurations
Evaluation Level
Section titled “Evaluation Level”This evaluator operates at the TRACE_LEVEL, evaluating the most recent turn in the conversation.
Parameters
Section titled “Parameters”model (optional)
Section titled “model (optional)”- Type:
Union[Model, str, None] - Default:
None(uses default Bedrock model) - Description: The model to use as the judge.
system_prompt (optional)
Section titled “system_prompt (optional)”- Type:
str | None - Default:
None(uses built-in template) - Description: Custom system prompt for the judge model.
include_inputs (optional)
Section titled “include_inputs (optional)”- Type:
bool - Default:
True - Description: Whether to include the input prompt in the evaluation context.
version (optional)
Section titled “version (optional)”- Type:
str - Default:
"v0" - Description: Prompt template version.
Scoring System
Section titled “Scoring System”| Rating | Score | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Not Concise | 0.0 | Response is excessively verbose or padded |
| Partially Concise | 0.5 | Response could be shorter but isn’t egregiously verbose |
| Perfectly Concise | 1.0 | Response communicates information efficiently |
A response passes the evaluation if the score is >= 0.5.
Basic Usage
Section titled “Basic Usage”from strands import Agentfrom strands_evals import Case, Experimentfrom strands_evals.evaluators import ConcisenessEvaluatorfrom strands_evals.mappers import StrandsInMemorySessionMapperfrom strands_evals.telemetry import StrandsEvalsTelemetry
telemetry = StrandsEvalsTelemetry().setup_in_memory_exporter()
def task_function(case: Case) -> dict: telemetry.in_memory_exporter.clear() agent = Agent( trace_attributes={"session.id": case.session_id}, callback_handler=None ) response = agent(case.input) spans = telemetry.in_memory_exporter.get_finished_spans() mapper = StrandsInMemorySessionMapper() session = mapper.map_to_session(spans, session_id=case.session_id) return {"output": str(response), "trajectory": session}
cases = [ Case(name="brief-answer", input="What is 2 + 2?")]
experiment = Experiment(cases=cases, evaluators=[ConcisenessEvaluator()])reports = experiment.run_evaluations(task_function)reports[0].run_display()Related Evaluators
Section titled “Related Evaluators”- CoherenceEvaluator: Evaluates logical consistency
- ResponseRelevanceEvaluator: Evaluates relevance to user questions
- HelpfulnessEvaluator: Evaluates helpfulness from user perspective